The questionable necessity of a new human right against being subject to automated decision-making

Abstract The development and interest in decision-making that is or can be automated have opened the doors of debate regarding form substance related means regulating its application. Part this discourse involves proposals advocating for creation a new human right not to subject an decision. This article questions whether such necessary light existing substantive rules under legal frameworks already applicable decision-making, specifically data protection, non-discrimination rights. There are also procedural challenges requiring treatment if adequately addressed by application law. Exploring these helps appreciate significance ensuring law better implemented purpose protecting beings settings where poses risks individuals groups.